🔥 Examination: Ahmadi Religion of Peace and Light

17.1. Refutation of Claims Made by 'Abdullāh Hāshim Abā al-Ṣādiq' in the Video: "1st Covenant with Adam"

Claim 1: "God commands all angels to prostrate to Adam, and Iblis refuses because he is prideful."

Statement:

Refutation:

This part aligns with the Quran but omits critical details and context. The Quran explicitly states:

Iblis as a Jinn, Not an Angel:

The Quran clarifies that Iblis was not an angel but a jinn:

Unlike angels, who are created from light and do not disobey Allah, jinn possess free will. This distinction is crucial to understanding the story.

The Nature of the Prostration:

According to Islamic scholars like Imam Al-Qurtubi and Ibn Kathir, the prostration commanded by Allah was not an act of worship but an act of respect and acknowledgment of Adam’s unique status as Allah’s appointed vicegerent (khalifah) on Earth.

Worship is reserved for Allah alone. The angels' prostration to Adam symbolized their acceptance of Allah’s wisdom and command.

Iblis’ Arrogance and Pride:

Iblis’ refusal was based on arrogance and envy. He viewed his creation from fire as superior to Adam’s creation from clay:

This refusal exemplifies the destructive nature of pride and disobedience. Ibn Kathir notes that Iblis failed to recognize that superiority lies in obedience to Allah, not in one’s material origin.

The Test of Obedience:

The command to prostrate was a test for the angels and Iblis, demonstrating that obedience to Allah is paramount, regardless of personal perceptions or logic. This lesson is emphasized throughout the Quran:

By omitting these details, 'Abdullāh Hāshim Abā al-Ṣādiq' misrepresents the nature of the prostration and Iblis’ disobedience, leading to a distorted understanding of the story.

Claim 2: "Adam's sin involved envy towards Fatimah al-Zahra (RA) and a desire for her."

Statement:

Refutation:

This claim is baseless and contradicts Islamic teachings. The Quran describes Adam's transgression as eating from the forbidden tree:

The Nature of the Transgression:

Adam and Hawwa (Eve) were forbidden to eat from a specific tree in Paradise as a test of obedience. The Quran makes no mention of envy or a desire for any other human or entity in this context.

The narrative is straightforward: Satan whispered to Adam and Hawwa, enticing them to eat from the tree by promising immortality or a kingdom:

Distorted Interpretation:

Associating Adam’s sin with Fatimah al-Zahra (RA) is an innovation (bid’ah) that has no basis in the Quran, authentic Hadiths, or scholarly consensus. Such speculative claims distort the clear and established teachings of Islam.

Islamic scholars emphasize that Adam’s mistake was purely related to disobeying a direct command from Allah, not envy or inappropriate desires.

Repentance and Forgiveness:

The Quran emphasizes Adam’s repentance and Allah’s mercy:

Allah’s acceptance of Adam’s repentance underscores the importance of humility and turning back to Allah after committing a mistake. No mention of Fatimah al-Zahra (RA) or any such narrative exists in this context.

Honoring Fatimah al-Zahra (RA):

Fatimah al-Zahra (RA), the daughter of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), is among the greatest women in Islam. However, her name is not associated with the story of Adam in any authentic Islamic source. Linking her to this story is speculative and disrespectful to her esteemed position in Islam.

In conclusion, this claim reflects a deliberate distortion of Islamic teachings and should be rejected outright.

Claim 3: "The tree Adam ate from symbolizes the knowledge of Muhammad (PBUH) and his family."

Statement:

Refutation:

The Quran does not specify the type of tree, and scholars agree that its nature is irrelevant to the moral lesson of the story.

Symbol of the Forbidden Tree:

The Quran explicitly describes the tree as a test of obedience rather than a symbol of esoteric knowledge or connection to Muhammad (PBUH) and his family. The test was straightforward:

Elaboration by Sheikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah:

• Ibn Taymiyyah, a renowned Islamic scholar, elaborates that the forbidden tree represents a concrete trial designed to test Adam and Hawwa’s submission and obedience to Allah. This test was rooted in a tangible, physical command - avoiding a specific tree in Paradise - and not in any symbolic or mystical meaning.

• The purpose of this test was to remind humanity that the Creator’s commands must be upheld, even if the reasons are not immediately apparent. By following such commands, human beings affirm their submission to Allah’s wisdom, which surpasses human understanding.

• Ibn Taymiyyah also emphasizes that associating allegorical meanings, such as linking the tree to "knowledge of Muhammad (PBUH) and his family," is baseless and distracts from the core lesson of the narrative: obedience and accountability.

Rejection of Speculative Interpretations:

Associating the forbidden tree with "the knowledge of Muhammad (PBUH) and his family" is speculative and lacks support in Islamic teachings. No Quranic verse or authentic Hadith endorses such a concept.

The Quran emphasizes that Satan’s deception led Adam and Hawwa to eat from the tree, not ignorance or lack of knowledge about Muhammad (PBUH) or his family:

“But Satan caused them to slip out of it and removed them from that [condition] in which they had been.” (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:36)

Moral Lessons from the Story:

The story of Adam and the forbidden tree highlights human fallibility, the consequences of disobedience, and Allah’s mercy. Attempting to attach esoteric meanings detracts from these universal lessons.

Scholarly Consensus:

Renowned scholars like Imam Al-Qurtubi and Ibn Kathir emphasize the clarity of the narrative: the tree was a trial to test Adam’s obedience, and its nature is not the focus. Introducing unfounded allegories, such as linking it to prophetic knowledge, contradicts Islamic orthodoxy.

In conclusion, the claim that the tree symbolizes "the knowledge of Muhammad and his family" is baseless and deviates from the Quranic narrative and scholarly interpretations.

Claim 4: "Cain is the offspring of Satan and Eve."

Statement:

Refutation:

This is a fabrication with no basis in the Quran or authentic Hadiths.

Adam as the Father of Cain and Abel:

The Quran explicitly names Adam as the father of Cain and Abel:

The Quran and Hadith make no mention of Satan having any role in the lineage of humanity. All human beings are descendants of Adam and Eve, as emphasized in the Quran:

Rejection of Gnostic Influence:

Claims of Eve being impregnated by Satan stem from Gnostic texts, which are not part of Islamic tradition. Such ideas are alien to Islamic teachings and are categorically rejected.

Moral Lessons from the Story of Cain and Abel:

The story of Cain and Abel (Qabil and Habil) in Islam focuses on the themes of jealousy, the sanctity of life, and the consequences of sin. Cain’s killing of Abel is described as the first murder, a crime inspired by his jealousy, not his lineage:

Scholarly Consensus:

Islamic scholars unanimously agree that attributing any supernatural or satanic lineage to Cain is unfounded. Such claims distract from the Quranic message and introduce speculative elements that deviate from established doctrine.

In conclusion, the claim that Cain is the offspring of Satan and Eve is a baseless fabrication that contradicts the Quran, Hadith, and the consensus of Islamic scholarship.

Claim 5: "Muhammad (PBUH) and his family created Adam with their hands."

Statement:

"The hands which created Adam were no other than Muhammad and the family of Muhammad. Specifically, it was Ali ibn Abi Talib who created Adam." (16:49)

Refutation:

This is blatant heresy.

Allah as the Sole Creator:

The Quran attributes the creation of Adam solely to Allah:

Furthermore, the Quran repeatedly emphasizes that creation belongs to Allah alone:

Violation of Tawheed:

Tawheed (monotheism) is the foundation of Islamic belief. Claiming that any human or entity participated in creation is shirk (associating partners with Allah), which is the gravest sin in Islam.

Ibn Kathir states in his Tafsir that the creation of Adam is described explicitly in the Quran as Allah shaping him from clay and breathing into him of His spirit:

“So when I have proportioned him and breathed into him of My [created] soul, then fall down to him in prostration.” (Surah Al-Hijr 15:29)

Rejection of Fabrications:

The claim that Muhammad (PBUH) or his family created Adam contradicts Quranic teachings and is not found in any authentic Hadith. Such assertions are not only baseless but also disrespect the foundational Islamic belief in Allah’s sole authority over creation.

In conclusion, attributing the creation of Adam to Muhammad (PBUH) or his family is a severe deviation from Islamic teachings and undermines the core principle of Tawheed.

Claim 6: "Circumcision originated from Adam’s remorseful act after being banished."

Statement:

Refutation:

Circumcision is a Sunnah that predates Islam and is directly linked to Prophet Ibrahim (AS), not Adam. The Quran and Hadiths provide clarity on this matter.

Historical Basis of Circumcision:

Circumcision is associated with the covenant between Allah and Ibrahim (AS):

Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) affirmed this practice as a part of Fitrah (natural disposition):

Hadith on Circumcision:

A specific Hadith mentions that Prophet Ibrahim (AS) was circumcised:

Rejection of Fabricated Narratives:

There is no evidence in the Quran or Hadith to suggest that Adam originated circumcision as an act of repentance. The idea that circumcision arose from Adam’s remorse is entirely unfounded and contradicts established Islamic teachings.

Islamic scholars agree that circumcision is a tradition stemming from Prophet Ibrahim (AS), signifying a covenant with Allah.

In conclusion, circumcision is a Sunnah tied to Prophet Ibrahim (AS) and the natural disposition (Fitrah) of humans. The claim that Adam initiated it as a form of repentance is baseless.

Conclusion

The claims made by 'Abdullāh Hāshim Abā al-Ṣādiq' are entirely unfounded, contradicting the Quran, authentic Hadiths, and the consensus of Islamic scholarship. These assertions misrepresent core Islamic teachings, propagate speculative and esoteric beliefs, and undermine the foundational principles of Tawheed and Prophetic tradition.

Key Takeaways:

• Reliance on Authentic Sources:
• Muslims are urged to rely on the Quran and Sahih Hadiths for guidance rather than speculative or fabricated narratives.
• Avoidance of Innovations (Bid’ah):
• Introducing unfounded interpretations and attributing divine roles to individuals is a severe deviation from Islamic orthodoxy.
• Understanding Allah’s Authority:
• Allah alone is the Creator, and all acts of worship and acknowledgment are directed solely to Him. Associating partners with Allah in any form is the gravest sin.

Final Reminder:

Allah says:

“And do not pursue that of which you have no knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, the sight, and the heart – about all those [one] will be questioned.” (Surah Al-Isra 17:36)

Let us remain steadfast in seeking knowledge from authentic sources and adhering to the straight path of Islam as taught by the Quran and the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).