Analysis of Well-Known Islamic Critiques and Their Supporting Arguments
Islamic scholars from various backgrounds have provided well-documented critiques of Ahmadi doctrines, challenging their theological foundations and questioning their compatibility with traditional Islamic teachings. The critiques focus on core issues like the finality of prophethood, the completeness of the Quran, and the dangers of self-proclaimed prophets or divinely inspired leaders.
A. The Doctrine of Finality of Prophethood (Khatam an-Nabiyyin)
Quranic Evidence for the Finality of Prophethood
One of the most commonly cited critiques of Ahmadi doctrines is their perceived challenge to the Quranic concept of the finality of prophethood. In Surah Al-Ahzab (33:40), the Quran clearly states:
مُحَمًدًا مَا كَانَ أَبَائِكُمُ مُنِ رَجُلاً وَلَكَنَ رَسُولًا لَكُمُ وَخِاتَّمًا النُبُيَنُ
“Muhammad is not the father of any one of your men, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the Seal of the Prophets.”
📔 Surah Al-Ahzab (33:40)B. Completeness and Sufficiency of the Quran
The Quran as a Comprehensive Source of Guidance
Islamic scholars argue that the Quran is a complete and self-sufficient source of guidance for Muslims. In Surah Al-Maidah (5:3), Allah declares, This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion. Scholars cite this verse to demonstrate that Islam, as conveyed through the Quran and the teachings of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), is comprehensive and requires no further prophets.
C. Islamic Principles on Rejecting Self-Appointed Prophets and Leaders
Historical Consensus on False Prophets
Islamic scholars draw on historical examples of figures who falsely claimed prophethood or divine inspiration. Figures such as Musaylima and Aswad Ansi were condemned as deviants for attempting to disrupt Islamic unity. Scholars view similar claims in Ahmadi doctrines as threats to the unity and purity of Islam.
D. Scholarly Consensus on the Role of the Mahdi and Jesus (Isa)
The Mahdi and Jesus as Defined in Traditional Eschatology
Islamic eschatology includes the figures of the Mahdi and the returning Jesus (Isa) (PBUH), who are expected to restore justice and reaffirm the teachings of Islam. Islamic scholars have clarified that these figures are not prophets nor sources of new revelation, but rather they work within the framework of the Quran and Sunnah.
E. Conclusion: Mainstream Islamic Scholars Position on Ahmadi Doctrines
Through Quranic verses, Hadith, historical consensus, and the principle of ijma, scholars argue that doctrines promoted by ARPL are inconsistent with the teachings of Islam. By adhering to Quran, Sunnah, and scholarly consensus, mainstream Islamic scholarship ensures doctrinal consistency and protects the faith from divisive innovations.